Search - JEvents
Search - Categories
Search - Contacts
Search - Content
Search - News Feeds
Search - Web Links
Search - SunBay
Search - JComments
Saturday, 12 August 2017 10:29

Goodbye to Circuses. Are Zoos Next? Featured

Written by
Rate this item
(0 votes)

When the Ringling Bros. circus was founded, Ulysses S. Grant was president and the South was in the middle of Reconstruction. The storied act sadly came to an end in May. Ringling, after years of harassment from animal rights activists, couldn't keep the show running.

Activists are already plotting to make zoos history as well.
Ringling's demise can be traced to its decision two years ago to stop having elephants in its shows. This move, which came after years of protests, litigation and lobbying campaigns from animal rights activists, caused a reduction in ticket sales since the main 4-ton attractions were gone.

Circus protests, however, were never about the circus. They were about the fact that animals are kept in captivity. Animal activists are now turning their sights toward zoos.

Animal rights groups have threatened lawsuits against small facilities under the Endangered Species Act, which forbids harming endangered species. Their theory is that it's a form of psychological harm to have animals in a pen.

Of course, you could give a tiger the equivalent of a five-star resort with a personal masseuse and an endless supply of gazelle tenderloin and animal rights activists would still claim it's cruelty.

They tried a similar tactic against Ringling Bros., filing a lawsuit under the Endangered Species Act claiming that the use of an elephant-handling tool was abusive. They lost and were countersued by Ringling's owner, eventually settling for $25 million.

Zoos are popular. According to recent polling, 89 percent of the public agrees that zoos and aquariums help increase appreciation for animals, and 93 percent believe these institutions are a valuable resource for seeing rare animals in a more personal way.

Unfortunately, the court system doesn't rely on public opinion. A handful of judges could create a real mess for the future of zoos and aquariums.

It's hard to overstate the impact this would have on animals. Zoos participate in species survival plans and wide-ranging projects to ensure genetic diversity of animals in zoos, and support research, education and reintroduction efforts for these animals.

Animal rights activism also has a human cost. Thousands of jobs are tied to zoos and aquariums. The Association of Zoos and Aquariums calculates that these facilities contribute $17.4 billion to the economy.

How can we save zoos from activist lawyers? One, if you give to animal charities, make sure you're not accidentally funding a radical group with a nice-sounding name.

Two, Congress needs to reform certain provisions of the Endangered Species Act. Congress could clarify that it's not illegal for animals to be kept in ways that are generally accepted by veterinarians. Or it could reform the private right to sue that exists under the law.

Zoos and aquariums have spent decades and millions of dollars to rehabilitate animal populations and educate the public about conservation. If we don't take ideological activists seriously, it could be the zoos that go extinct.

Read 998 times

Add comment


Security code
Refresh

250x250

digital version