The most important citizen gaslighting project in American history began with a shock-and-awe operation, Lincoln’s War to Enslave the States, then followed by a 12year-long military occupation aptly named ‘Reconstruction’. At the end of that 16-year attack on its own People, Washington DC had hijacked our lawful silver and gold money, our Militias, and our sovereign powers retained by the People and States in our republican form of government that we stipulate in the Constitution. Having stolen our money, sovereignty, and Militias, the new federal master further built out its pantheon in D.C., its imperial citystate, divorced from the 50 states and no longer subservient to them. To become the master of the States and American People, it had to build this pantheon of huge buildings and monuments for the same reason that the wealthy and powerful families, guilds, and senators of Rome had to do in that city: to intimidate every visitor who arrived there from all the conquered lands in its empire. Architectural Intimidation Have you ever wondered why, of all the idolatrous monuments in Washington D.C., the massive, Greek-Parthenon-style Lincoln Memorial is so huge and dramatically lit and why the idol of Lincoln is ten times life-size, seated on a throne, and housed in a gargantuan, imperial shrine? As was the practice of Rome, the D.C. city-state employs massive, out-of-proportion, dominating architecture to signal to the fawning ‘mere citizens’ who visit that city-state that they pay for: “Behold, the human mascot of your allpowerful deliverer and master!”. Congress’ IRS operation and the huge D.C. monuments and architecture are tools of intimidation. Then, while Teddy Roosevelt claimed hundreds of millions of acres of STATE public lands for Washington DC, federal judges and agencies claimed the oil, gas, timber, water, and minerals on and underneath those acres. A multi-trilliondollar swindle, creating massive federal bureaucracies offering lifetime fat employment to Uncle Sam’s functionaries if they keep the commoners in line! The Lincoln myth is D.C. shorthand for who is boss, who runs things, who keeps order, and who divides spoils. Exactly like Alexis DeTocqueville warned in 1835, the bloated federal industry has done extensive programming through government schools for five generations, planting lies as truth deep in your psyche. Children must recite Lincoln’s words instead of Washington’s, Jefferson’s, or especially those of James Madison, Father of the Constitution. Does that make sense? Sure, for gaslighting purposes it does. See all those drones still wearing masks? The fact that Tax Day is April 15 is seemingly another cynical act of Congress’ many cynical acts to jab the eyes of its taxpayer oxen just because it can. April 12 is the 161st anniversary of Lincoln’s first diabolical move in his War to Enslave the States, at a federal tax collection facility at the mouth of Charleston Harbor. The speech that I reproduce below concerns one of the best-kept secrets of many littleknown facts about Lincoln’s War to Enslave the States. The speech was originally delivered about a decade ago by Val Coleman, under the pseudonym ‘Lady Val’; it is a factual survey of the people and their actions during the weeks leading up to April 12, 1861 when Dis-honest Abe Lincoln in several deft moves pulled the trigger to hijack our Constitution, our lawful money and our constitutional Militias. Lincoln, Fort Sumter, and the Strategy to Initiate War A Speech by Val Coleman I come before you tonight to say a very few words about a man who is certainly well known to you all – the 16th President of the United States, Abraham Lincoln. I say a very few words because to cover the subject in any depth at all would require far more time than I have. Indeed, the difficulty in addressing the subject at all is made even greater by the wealth of material already known about Lincoln that is, in fact, untrue. Unraveling the Lincoln myth of necessity increases many times over the amount of correct information that must be told. I therefore had two choices: present a wealth of what you might call factoids about the man with little or no corroborating information or cover one seminal point at length and in greater detail. I choose to do the latter. The Most Important Fact of Lincoln’s War The question then became, what point should I cover that will make a difference in your own view of history? Or more important still, what incident involving Lincoln will make a difference in our understanding of history itself rather than simply the history of Abraham Lincoln? Does it matter that Lincoln was not the deeply spiritual man we were led to believe but totally irreligious and even blasphemous in his opinions and utterances? Does it matter that he was not the Great Emancipator? Is the fact important that Lincoln’s humor was not folksy but bawdy and profane? Is it pertinent that he was no political babe in the woods but an established hack in Illinois politics which was as corrupt then as it is now? Frankly, no, it does not. These points may make a difference in the myth of St. Abraham the Pure, but they do not affect the more important aspects of what Lincoln actually did as opposed to what people have been led to believe he did. To my mind, the most important point of history that needs to be addressed in any expose of Lincoln is the myth that the South fired the first shot of the War, thus bringing upon itself all the calamities that followed. Of course, we are talking about the attack on Fort Sumter. Every schoolchild – and therefore, virtually every adult – knows that the South fired on the United States flag without provocation or with very little provocation – but nothing could be further from the truth. It would take an entire library of books to detail the background of the decades long series of events which led to the War of Secession. Many textbooks and commentaries falsely simplify the process by declaring that the South started the War - apparently without provocation - by firing on Union-held Fort Sumter in Charleston harbor. Case closed? Well, not exactly! Secession is Every State’s Right By the time of the firing on Fort Sumter on April 12th, 1861, seven states had already seceded from the Union. It was the desire of these states - South Carolina, Mississippi, Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana and Texas - to leave the Union in peace. It was also the consensus of most Northerners and Northern newspapers that secession was a constitutional right even if it might not be the best course of action. An editorial in one newspaper, The Bangor, Maine DAILY UNION, on November 12th, 1860, summed up this belief when it stated: “Union depends for its continuance on the free consent and will of the sovereign people of each state... A state coerced to remain in the Union is a 'subject province' and can never be a co-equal member of the American Union”. Supreme Court Justice Samuel Nelson advised the U.S. Secretary of State that it would be a violation of the Constitution if the President used coercion against any state in an attempt to force it to remain in, or return to, the Union. Not Military Fort; an IRS Facility So why did the Southern troops stationed in Charleston fire upon Fort Sumter when public opinion in both the North and South seemed to be on the side of the secessionists? Well, to start, it all goes back to the purpose of Fort Sumter. It was not a military fort; it protected nothing. Rather, its purpose was the collection of tariffs from ships entering the harbor at Charleston. You see, like all wars, the Great War of 1861-65 was fought for money. Abraham Lincoln had been asked shortly after his inauguration why the Southern states should not be allowed to leave the Union in peace. His response was a sarcastic question which I paraphrase: Let them go? Let them go?!! Then where, sir, would I get my revenues? Lincoln knew that approximately 75% of federal revenues were collected at Southern ports in the form of tariffs and Charleston was a major collection point through Fort Sumter. President Buchanan’s Agreement In early December of 1860, President James Buchanan had signed an agreement with South Carolina’s Congressional representatives that forts Moultrie and Sumter would not be reinforced nor would they take aggressive action against Charleston. In return, the forts would not be attacked by South Carolina’s forces. Shortly after South Carolina seceded on December 20th, 1860, Major Robert Anderson moved the troops stationed at Fort Moultrie to Fort Sumter in an action that disturbed and puzzled the officials in Charleston. Previous to this, in early December of 1860, President-elect Abraham Lincoln had instructed General Winfield Scott, head of all Federal forces, to prepare a plan to hold or retake the forts after Lincoln's inauguration on March 4th, 1861 despite the agreement signed by President Buchanan. Unbeknownst to Buchanan, General Scott sent a ship on January 7th, 1861 with supplies and 200 concealed troops to reinforce The Sun Bay Paper Page 12 April 15, 2022 - April 21, 2022 Cont to pg 16 History is Written by the Victors
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjA2ODE3